Showing posts with label RT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RT. Show all posts

Mar 1, 2010

Ex-KGB media mogul pays £1 to buy second British newspaper - RT Top Stories

Ex-KGB media mogul pays £1 to buy second British newspaper - RT Top Stories

Published 01 March, 2010, 16:12


Russian tycoon and owner of the National Reserve Bank, Aleksandr Lebedev, has added another British newspaper to his media empire.
According to British reports he bought The Independent for the token price of £1 – the same as it costs to buy one copy of the newspaper.
Lebedev is taking on all the newspaper’s debts, which supposedly amount to losses of around $10 million a year for both The Independent and The Independent on Sunday. He is also going to pay $15 million to buy the paper out of its already existing printing contract, which is supposed to run for another 10 years. Lebedev will be scrapping all that. He has also gained a lot of respect for that in media circles.
          
He has re-negotiated the pension packages and redundancy payments for newspaper’s staff.
Lebedev has said that he really cut a very clever deal because the terms of those agreements will no longer be so favorable.
The media mogul will be investing about $50 million into these newspapers over the next five years in an attempt to turn this loss-making enterprise around.
Lebedev has not yet explained his motivation for the deal, but this is by no means his starting point. He already owns 40 per cent of Russia’s Novaya Gazeta newspaper, for which murdered journalist Anna Politkovskaya worked. In January 2009, he bought another loss-making British newspaper, The Evening Standard, and he is currently trying to turn that around.
Of course, one of the things he could get from the acquisition is political clout. He has already been invited to a meeting with Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Apparently the British PM wanted to see the new owner of The Independent in person, and it is said that the meeting went quite well.
Evidently, Lebedev is not going to make a lot of money out of his new acquisition in the short term, but is definitely intending to get some kind of influence and position in British society that he might not get otherwise.
Newspaper consultant Richard Addis told RT that “commercially he [Lebedev] wants to make money, but politically, I’d guess, he wants influence, access, a position in British and international society that he has not quite got at the moment.”
“Staff really do not care , as long as somebody actually pays the wages and keeps the paper alive,” added Addis, “I think the staff are quite relieved to have a new owner with money.”
British public, traditionally opposing Russians coming in and buying anything in Britain, particularly newspapers, reacted not as much as one would expect. When Lebedev bought The Evening Standard there was a lot of controversy involved. But Lebedev has already almost turned the paper around and gained a lot of respect for that in newspaper circles.
The Evening Standard was and still is a loss-making enterprise, but it is expected to turn a profit in two to three years’ time. Lebedev quadrupled the newspaper’s circulation by making it a free paper.
There is a general feeling that newspapers are a failing medium, so anyone coming in and buying those titles and keeping them going and turning them around is welcomed by the industry.
The public have either never heard about the deal or do not care. Some bet on how long The Independent is going to carry on being The Independent.
The deal has not gone through yet, but it is expected to be fulfilled in the next few days.
Time will tell what The Independent is going to transform into: either it will be a free newspaper, like The Evening Standard, or it may become a glossy daily opinion magazine.

Dec 19, 2009

Communists in Moldova sabotage presidential vote

Communists in Moldova sabotage presidential vote - RT

Published 07 December, 2009, 15:44

Edited 07 December, 2009, 23:11

Moldova’s parliament has failed to elect a president after the opposition refused to support the sole presidential candidate Marian Lupu. Thus, the political crisis in the eastern European country is going to continue.




On Monday, prior to the scheduled vote, the nominee of the ruling Alliance for European Integration – which unites the Democratic Party, the Liberal Party, the Liberal Democrats and Our Moldova party – presented his program to the parliament.

Lupu vowed to “open a new page” in the settlement of the Trans-Dniester conflict and to resume the “5+2” (Moldova, Trans-Dniester, Ukraine, Russia, the OSCE and monitors from the US and the EU) talks on the breakaway region.

Read more

Trans-Dniester has been seeking independence from Moldova since the final days of the Soviet Union. The region has a predominantly Russian and Ukrainian population, with Moldavians a considerable minority. In late 1980, the local authorities in Moldova sought closer ties with Romania, and Trans-Dniester's population – which feared discrimination – launched a campaign of civil disobedience.

The tension erupted into armed conflict, which was stopped by Russian peacekeepers. The region's peace process is sponsored by Ukraine, Russia, the European Union, the United States and the OSCE. So far Trans-Dniester is not recognised as an independent state by any major country.

However, despite Lupu’s promises to address the issue of the disputed region in Eastern Europe, the opposition – the Communist party – refused to vote for the candidate and decided not to take part in the election.

In a declaration read out by the Communists’ leader, Maria Postoico, it was explained that the decision is a sign of protest against the alliance’s policies. In addition, the former comrades apparently couldn’t forgive Lupu – a former communist – for his “betrayal”.

Earlier, the opposition leader and former Moldovan president Vladimir Voronin said that communists wouldn’t vote for Lupu because they want the parliament to be dissolved and snap elections held.

The state leader in Moldova is elected by the country’s parliament. 61 votes are required for the president to be elected. The coalition has 53 mandates and the communists – 48, therefore without the opposition support the ruling alliance cannot choose the head of the state.

"I believe that a way out of the political collapse in the country could be brought about by a referendum on constitutional changes," Marian Lupu told RIA Novosti on Monday.

December 7 vote has become the third time this year that the former Soviet sate was trying to elect a president.

After the disputed parliamentary election in April this year followed by violent protests in the capital Chisinau, the Communists' candidate twice failed to get the required votes. As a result, snap elections were held in July and brought a liberal-democratic coalition to power.

Now, after the presidential election attempt has failed one again, snap elections will be held in 2010, since according to Moldovan law, the parliament cannot be dissolved more than once a year.

Dec 14, 2009

The revolution will be twitterized - RT

The revolution will be twitterized - RT
Published 27 November, 2009, 10:14
Edited 30 November, 2009, 13:31"

With a photo of his face pasted over that iconic photo of Che Guevara as his avatar and a stream of sarcastic missives, Dmitry Rogozin could be mistaken for an ordinary politically-opinionated Twitterer.




But he is not. Instead, Dmitry Rogozin is Russia’s envoy to NATO – one of few high-ranking politicians who chose to embrace the Twitter phenomenon.

Read more

Considering the country’s relationship with the military alliance is akin to a particularly rancorous soap opera, Rogozin holds one of the most visible and sensitive posts in the country.

But his offerings are anything but diplomatic. The 140-character limit the micro-blogging site imposes on its members’ updates has unleashed a pungent, but laconic wit. “NATO suggested holding the NATO-Russia Council meeting at level of Foreign Ministers in format of a lunch. Maybe we should meet in a sauna?” and “On Friday I gave a speech at NATO's Defence College. I got a bit blinded by the gold of the shoulder straps :)” give a fair representation of Dmitry Rogozin’s style. In his lighter moments, the Envoy is just as prepared to make uncharitable quips on the shortcomings of the national football team, or the air quality in Moscow.

“When I give interviews, my words are filtered by journalists who have their biases and opinions” Rogozin told RT, adding, “but, it’s important to cut out the middle man when you are speaking to the public.”

The image of the outsider who speaks directly to his people is familiar to Rogozin from his days as a populist politician. His Motherland Party, which combined socialism and nationalism to create a potent – sometimes toxic – mix, captured nearly ten percent of the vote in 2003. But infighting and a difficult relationship with the Kremlin meant Rogozin resigned three years later.

His appointment to Brussels in 2007 was initially greeted with disbelief by those expecting to see a grey-suited technocrat to fill the post. And two years later, the Envoy can still seem like a fish out of water.

“In Brussels free time appears most unexpectedly,” he explains when asked about why he decided to go on Twitter. “Usually you are listening to some boring politician drone on. Your mobile is always at hand, so you covertly press a few keys and off the message goes”

With just over a thousand followers, Rogozin is unlikely to be giving Barack Obama sleepless nights (the US president has more than 2.7 million hanging onto his every tweet).

But a Twitter account is increasingly being seen as a useful, even essential weapon in any politician’s arsenal.

Many see Obama’s ability to mobilize his supporters with timely twittering during his epic primary battle against Hillary Clinton last year as the moment Politics 2.0 became reality.

Though it is still unclear whether the greater political benefits came in the form of contributions through his donors, or the acres of mainstream media coverage that the ultra-hip candidate attracted.

But, as the greater experience the US has with Twitter shows, the social network can become a politician’s enemy.

US Republican grandee Newt Gingrich was in trouble after apparently implying that Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor was a racist in a spontaneous, hot-headed tweet.

Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley got a rap for his use of the English language after posting the following discourse on the merits of Barack Obama’s policies:

"Pres Obama while u sightseeing in Paris u said 'time to delivr on healthcare' When you are a 'hammer' u think evrything is NAIL I'm no NAIL."

And although it wasn’t on his own feed, Obama himself landed in hot water after his off-record remark calling rapper Kanye West “a jackass” which was tweeted for the whole world to see.

So, Russian politicians should beware before they make the digital leap. And even if it is adopted by the entire political elite, will Twitter be the innovation it is hyped up to be? After all, President Dmitry Medvedev already maintains a popular LiveJournal blog, and Vladimir Putin – no one’s idea of a gadget geek – can partly attribute his sky-high poll ratings to massive question-and-answer telecasts, in which millions of Russians bombard him with questions via phones, satellite-link and email.

Not that I would want to downplay the groundbreaking nature of Envoy Rogozin’s Twitter feed, lest I become the subject of one of his web-lashings.

Igor Ogorodnev, RT