May 26, 2012

Fight for Ukraine is not over

By Irina Severin | 05.25.2012
Merkel seeks Tymoshenko's  treatment In Germany. Tymoshenko's safety in Ukraine can not be guaranteed despite the extra security measures employed

Moderate expectations

A shift in the EU relation to Ukraine from threatening with boycott  to cooperation hopefully will give its fruits. Azarov's invitation for the EU lawyers to take part in Tymoshenko trial gives possibility to resolve the problem with Tymoshenko imprisonment without creating an impression that Yanukovych gave up to the pressure, but he does this in the context of approximation of the Ukrainian judiciary system  to the EU standards. 
The problem for the EU is that Yanukovych never gives up to the pressure - be it from Moscow or from Brussels. An opposite - if the pressure is applied he will act against his own interests and the interests of the country protecting first of all his self-esteem. Even if black and white approach is understandable at the parliamentary level, as politicians care more about the impression they create and reelection and not always are able to get to the the essence of the problem, at the executive and diplomatic level should be employed more sophisticated approach.
It seems that a search for the mutual acceptable solution was exactly the reason of the Ukrainian  prime-minister invitation for the European lawyers to take part in the Tymoshenko trial as well as the proposition that they can study all related to the case documents in order to evaluate them from the European point of view.  
In this situation the EU's approach doesn't need to be too formal and legalistic "monitoring panel', as proposed by the EU Parliament Resolution on Ukraine. The EU's experts participation should be proactive, suggesting solutions combined with the advices for the reformation of the judiciary system in general. Tymoshenko case should become a positive precedent of the cooperation of the EU and Ukraine in the context of the approximation of the Ukrainian judiciary system to the European standards.   

Russia's Stake in Tymoshenko's case

Though there are some pitfalls here. Some  experts insist the Ukrainian judiciary system is under the Russian unofficial control and Russia is not interested  that Ukraine resolves the Tymoshenko problem and gets out of isolation. After Azarov's invitation for the European lawyers prosecutors  immediately tried to downplay Azarov's proposition. 
Despite all measures of security applied to Tymoshenko  Yanukovych is unable to control everything. There is a danger that if the cooperation with the European judiciary experts will get a positive dynamic something can happen to Tymoshenko. Tymoshenko case plays the same role in a potential Ukrainian isolation as it was with Gongadze case, which led Kuchma's Ukraine to isolation ten years ago. Such developments must be excluded from the start and the best way is to let Tymoshenko get treatment in Germany before the case is resolved, otherwise consequences could be fatal for all involved.  Azarov's declarations on fight with the terrorism and acquisition of four armored Mercedes for Yanukovych only prove the fact that Ukrainian authorities does not able to fully guaranty Tymoshenko's security. Not to mention ritual explosions in the Tymoshenko's home town last month and still unexplained aggression against her in the jail. Tymoshenko should be warranted in absentia in order to exclude all possible provocations.
As strange as it is the ideologist of the first 'show case' against the Tymoshenko-Putin gas contract was not Yanukovych, but the Orange Revolution President Victor Yuschenko, who had his stake in the previous contract with Gazprom. The trial against Tymosdhenko as he explains was designed to make Russia to change devastating for Ukraine gas contract, which leads Ukraine to economic failure and higher dependence from Russia. Yanukovych implemented  Yuschenko's scenario, but at some point this scenario went out of control
Putin, who hates Tymoshenko for the Orange Revolution humiliation was glad to see her imprisoned. In fact he provoked it. During the ceremony of signing the contract Putin emphasized his special "gratitude to Tymoshenko for taking personal responsibility for the contract". On practice this meant Tymoshenko's omitting compulsory confirmation of the deal by the Ukrainian Cabinet of ministers, what became the main accusation in Tymoshenko's sentence, which along with her mentions also Putin and Medvedev. 
The latter detail didn't excite Moscow, which in exchange for promise to review the contract   suggested to initiate other cases against Tymoshenko, which not affect Russia's reputation. This was exactly what the prosecutors have done reviving old cases against Tymoshenko. As Azarov declared in Brussels: he suddenly realized that they "played by someone else script". Hopefully the awareness of this fact will help Ukrainian authorities to start their own game. Participation of the EU lawyers in the Tymoshenko trial will be only fair taking into account the EU's indirect stake in the signing of this contract and though its symbolical share of responsibility.

Political Contract - Political Trial

Tymoshenko's prosecutors and Ukrainian authorities insist that Tymoshenko's case is not politically motivated despite the common view that this is just an attempt to get rid off the political opponent. The case is political from the start as Tymoshenko has the 2009 gas deal was made under the huge political pressure from the Russian side, which got proportions of the so called "Gas War". 
Cutting the gas supply at the 6th of January Putin left to freeze the half of the Europe during the abnormally cold winter, not to mention the economic losses.  Health and even life of a lot of people in the Eastern Europe  were endangered. Moreover this was not a spontaneous action from the Russian side - this was a very well thought and thoroughly prepared action meant to discredit Ukraine in the European's eyes and to impose unsupportable conditions to Ukraine in such way  bankrupting the country economically and morally. 
Russia intended to prove that Ukraine is not a reliable partner and in such way to break the resistance of those in Europe, who at that stage was still was opposing to building of the Russian-German gas pipe-line 'Nord Stream' and advocating another joint venture - the South Stream gas pipeline, which should bypass Ukraine depriving it from any geopolitical and economic significance and making it more prone to return under the Russian rule. Also during  the signing the contract was clearly articulated Russia's demand to overtake the Ukrainian pipeline, which still has a strategical significance for the Ukrainian independence. Putin's agenda behind this contract was merely political despite his attempts to present this deal as purely economic and totally legal. 

Man-made Force Majeure Condition

Signing the contract Tymoshenko first of all was rescuing  the half of Europe and the Europeans.  In such force majeure situation  (even if it was not natural, but a man-made disaster) , Tymoshenko didn't have much space for a maneuver in negotiations. Putin's intransigence and malignity during negotiations were obvious for everybody and deliberately emphasized.  This force majeure condition justifies the fact that Tymoshenko has cut some necessary and important in normal situation bureaucratic procedures which is the main charge against her. Tymoshenko was put in the situation of the radical choice: to unblock the situation or to keep people in the EU freezing. 
The fact that Ukraine were loosing to Russia the information war put an additional psychological pressure on Tymoshenko. Russia being well prepared to the attack in advance has caught Ukraine totally unprepared for such developments. 
Besides the immense political pressure the negotiations had an exhausting character lasting for 10 hour without any break, what put enormous physical pressure on Tymoshenko. It seems that she had overestimated her personal power resources. She is not a super-human as she often tends to think. But did she had a choice?

Psychological  pressure as negotiations tool

The negotiations process looks like a torturing for Merkel to the greatest satisfaction of Putin
It is impossible to exclude and another kind of psychological pressure.  Putin is known for intentional application of  a psychological pressure during negotiations. There is a high probability that Tymoshenko also became an object of unaware to her psychological  pressure. The most well-known case is Angela Merkel's, with Putin abusing her fear of dogs - the  case  described by the Foreign Policy Magazine:
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, a master of psychological diplomacy, has repeatedly attempted to take advantage of Merkel's fear. In 2006, the then-president perplexed German diplomats by presenting the chancellor with a small dog as a gift and made a habit of having his black Labrador, Koni, sit in on their meetings. Putin's successor, Dmitry Medvedev, has put a stop to the practice.
This case just proves Putin's readiness for applying psychological pressure during negotiations. The habit can be explained by his professional training of the KGB agent including torturing and psychological influencing techniques. Thus it would be a total neglect from Putin's side not to use his expertise in these matter during the 2009 gas negotiations when the stakes were extremely high.  

The means: from vodka to psychotropic weapons

During Azarov's stay in Brussels Yanukovych  in apparently altered state of mind was getting a reprogramming in Moscow
The means of pressure can differ from a banal vodka in combination with NLP techniques to more sophisticated approaches meant to induce a victim in trance making it vulnerable to imposed will. Recently Putin made public his plans for creation of the psychotropic weapons, however  the Russian scientists insist that Moscow already for a long time possesses such kind of weapons, applicable on both individual basis and mass scale, but Moscow does everything to keep them a secret. 
The psychological technologies produced by Putin's laboratories allow to induce in trance and to impose his will not only to targeted individuals, but to entire nations. Greece is one of examples. Induced in deep trance by the chaos of devastating and well organised protests at the end of 2008 (Putin's vendetta for the Lisbon Treaty voted by the Greek parliament despite the previous promise of the prime-minister to organise a referendum on this matter in exchange for the generous  sweat-heart deals with Gazprom) that triggered the Greece crisis, the country became vulnerable to massive tailor-made for Greeks anti-establishment and anti-European propaganda, what led to the rise of the ultra-left and ultra-right parties in the country and threatens with collapse not only Greece, but the entire EU.  

The day of signing the contract: the fine-print of the deal between Kiev and Moscow has not been made public (BBC)
Whatever the 'magic means' were applied Tymoshenko's super-task in that situation was to save the Europe from the cold and she didn't have another choice than  to agree for the devastating contract. The gas price stipulated in the contract is twice higher than for European countries.  At the same time Russia pays to Ukraine only half of the gas transit price what costs to Ukraine 3,5 billions per year. The 'pay or use' clause in the contract, binding to draw contracted volumes from Gazprom, makes Ukraine to pay for unused volumes of gas 300 % of penalty charges, what made for 2009-2010 4,2 billion dollars.  In general ex-president Victor Yuschenko claims loss of 11-12 billion dollars per year due to the Tymoshenko-Putin deal, what is incompatible with the independence of Ukraine. Since the Nord Stream pipeline was launched Ukraine has lost 15% of its revenues for the gas transit to the EU.
Having a stake in this matter the EU could not only help to resolve the Tymoshenko's case, but without much effort to play a role of a mediator between Ukraine and Russia in revision of the gas deal. Helping Ukraine the EU is helping itself. If Ukraine is left in the cold of Russia's embrace the EU it will get an authoritarian 'great power' neighbour imposing old-fashion domination on Europe by 'futuristic means'.

Irina Severin is a journalist and political analyst, former diplomat.

Related articles:


Putin targets foes with 'zombie' gun which attack victims' central nervous system

  • Could be used against Russia's enemies and perhaps its own dissidents

Mind-bending ‘psychotronic’ guns that can effectively turn people into zombies have been given the go-ahead by Russian president Vladimir Putin.
The futuristic weapons – which will attack the central nervous system of their victims – are being developed by the country’s scientists.
They could be used against Russia’s enemies and, perhaps, its own dissidents by the end of the decade.
Fire: Putin, seen using a traditional pistol, has new weapons in his sights

( Fire: Putin, seen using a traditional pistol, has new weapons in his sights.)
Sources in Moscow say Mr Putin has described the guns, which use electromagnetic radiation like that found in microwave ovens, as ‘entirely new instruments for achieving political and strategic goals’.
Mr Putin added: ‘Such high-tech weapons systems will be comparable in effect to nuclear weapons, but will be more acceptable in terms of political and military ideology.’
Plans to introduce the super- weapons were announced quietly last week by Russian defence minister Anatoly Serdyukov, fulfilling  a little-noticed election campaign pledge by president-elect Putin.
Plans to introduce the super- weapons were announced quietly last week by Russian defence minister Anatoly Serdyukov
Plans to introduce the super- weapons were announced quietly last week by Russian defence minister Anatoly Serdyukov
Mr Serdyukov said: ‘The development  of weaponry based on new physics principles – direct-energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, genetic weapons, psychotronic weapons, and so on – is part  of the state arms procurement programme for 2011-2020.’
Specific proposals on developing the weapons are due to be drawn  up before December by a new Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency.
Research into electromagnetic weapons has been secretly carried out in the US and Russia since the Fifties. But now it appears Mr Putin has stolen a march on the Americans. Precise details of the Russian gun have not been revealed. However, previous research has shown that low-frequency waves or beams can affect brain cells, alter psychological states and make it possible to transmit suggestions and commands directly into someone’s thought processes.
High doses of microwaves can damage the functioning of internal organs, control behaviour or even drive victims to suicide. Anatoly Tsyganok, head of the Military Forecasting Centre in Moscow, said: ‘This is a highly serious weapon.
‘When it was used for dispersing a crowd and it was focused on a man, his body temperature went up immediately as if he was thrown into a hot frying pan. Still, we know very little about this weapon and even special forces guys can hardly cope with it.’
The long-term effects are not known, but two years ago a former major in the Russian foreign intelligence agency, the GRU, died in Scotland after making claims about such a weapons programme to MI6.
Sergei Serykh, 43, claimed he was a victim of weapons which he said were ‘many times more powerful than in the Matrix films’.
Mr Serykh died after falling from a Glasgow tower block with his wife and stepson in March 2010. While his death was assumed to be suicide, his family fear there was foul play.
Last night the Ministry of Defence declined to comment.